D3 Security Morpheus vs Exaforce

D3 Security Morpheus

D3 Security is a Vancouver-based automation vendor that built SOAR products before launching Morpheus, which it describes as an accountable agentic SOC platform. The vendor states that Morpheus autonomously handles both first-line triage and second-line work: full attack path investigation, blast radius assessment and playbook generation, without analyst intervention. An Attack Path Discovery engine produces an attack narrative, horizontal and vertical attack paths, MITRE ATT&CK mapping and a timeline, and Morpheus generates and executes response playbooks at runtime. It claims more than 800 integrations and supports cloud, on-premise, hybrid and air-gapped deployment. Named customers on the vendor site include PwC, Scotiabank and S&P Global.

Pros
  • The vendor FAQ states second-line investigation, blast radius assessment and runtime response playbooks explicitly (d3security.com/faq)
  • Offers cloud, on-premise, hybrid and air-gapped deployment, which most agentic SOC vendors do not (d3security.com/faq)
  • SOC 2 Type II stated by the vendor
  • Rated 4.2 out of 5 across 69 reviews on G2 (g2.com/products/d3-security/reviews)
Things to check
  • Performance claims, including investigating 95% of alerts in under two minutes, are vendor-stated and unaudited
  • Independent coverage of Morpheus is largely syndicated vendor content rather than analyst evaluation
  • The vendor FAQ does not mention threat hunting; that capability is claimed only on the vendor blog
  • SOC 2 Type II only; no ISO 27001 or FedRAMP authorisation found

Pricing: Not published. The vendor describes a fixed annual subscription tied to a daily alert volume tier, from 500 to 10,000 alerts per day with custom pricing above that, plus named user licences and no per-alert fees.

Exaforce

Exaforce is a San Jose company founded in 2023 offering an agentic SOC platform built on a real-time knowledge graph. Four agents the vendor calls Exabots cover detection, triage, investigation and response across more than 100 integrations spanning AWS, Azure, GCP, Okta, GitHub, CrowdStrike and Splunk. Exabot Investigate supports cross-environment pivoting and natural-language hunting, and Exabot Respond executes containment such as isolating instances, disabling users and revoking sessions, with human approval gates where configured. It is sold either customer-operated or as an Exaforce-run managed detection and response service. The company raised $75m in April 2025 and $125m in May 2026.

Pros
  • Names its containment actions explicitly rather than describing response in general terms (exaforce.com/platform/exabot-respond)
  • Ships a dedicated investigation and hunting agent separate from triage (exaforce.com/platform/exabot-investigate)
  • $200m raised across two rounds, reported at a $725m valuation (SecurityWeek, TechCrunch, May 2026)
  • Named customers include Replit and Guardant Health (TechCrunch, May 2026)
Things to check
  • Around 20 customers as of May 2026, so the deployment base is small (TechCrunch, May 2026)
  • Cloud, SaaS and identity focused, with no self-hosted option stated
  • Pricing is not published
  • Certifications are vendor-stated on the site footer rather than shown on a public register

Pricing: Not published; contact sales