Independent cybersecurity directory, built from public sources. Featured listings are paid placements and always labelled. How we work

CyberArk Conjur vs Infisical

CyberArk Conjur and Infisical are both enterprise solutions. CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform, while Infisical open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Updated Feb 2026

Summary

Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security is your priority and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements. Choose Infisical if open-source and transparent matters most and teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience.

Choose CyberArk Conjur if:

  • You value enterprise-grade security
  • You value open-source community edition
  • You value strong compliance support
  • You want to avoid newer platform, less proven at scale
  • You want to avoid fewer integrations than Vault

Choose Infisical if:

  • You value open-source and transparent
  • You value modern UI and developer experience
  • You value self-host or cloud option
  • You want to avoid complex setup and configuration
  • You want to avoid enterprise pricing can be high

Feature Comparison

FeatureCyberArk ConjurInfisical
PricingOpen source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on requestFree (self-hosted) / Cloud from $6/user/month
Pricing ModelEnterprise licensePer-user
Open SourceYesYes
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForLarge enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirementsTeams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience
Policy-as-code access controlSupportedNot available
Machine identity managementSupportedNot available
Centralized audit trailSupportedNot available

Sources

Related

Full Secrets Management guideCyberArk Conjur AlternativesInfisical AlternativesCyberArk Conjur OverviewInfisical Overview

Shortlists these appear on